Skip to main content
Public overview

Pincushion Demo Estate

Fictional data · ZAR

Decision-driving inputs

Discount decision

Deterministic recalculation
R
R
%
%
R
R
R
R
R
R

Inputs are synthetic and recalculate locally through PP's deterministic services. They never enter Actuals, Budget or a real venue record.

Management question

Locked evidence · 2026-09-16

The customer wants a discount. What does saying yes actually cost us?

The requested R12 000 discount cuts booking profit from R30 000 to R18 000 and moves the monthly forecast from R5 000 above target to R7 000 below.

What PP sees

The quote is healthy before the request. The requested discount crosses both the booking margin target and monthly profit target.

What is driving it

  1. 1. Requested price reduction−R12 000
  2. 2. Unchanged delivery costR90 000

Consequence

Revenue R120 000 → R108 000; margin 25.0% → 16.7%.

Impact on the venue

  • Monthly Latest Forecast R205 000 → R193 000
  • Monthly target position R5 000 above → R7 000 below

Reference point

Maximum concession retaining 22.0% margin

R4 615 / 3.8%

Before

25.0%

R 30 000

→

After request

16.7%

R 18 000

Target margin 22.0%

Management options

1. Target-preserving discount

Maximum concession R4 615 (3.8%)

Revenue R115 385 · profit R25 385 · 22.0% margin

Profit lower by R4 615

Delivery cost remains unchanged.

2. Reduce scope

Remove the approved R8 000 inclusion and reduce price by the same amount

Revenue R112 000 · cost R85 000 · profit R27 000

Profit falls R3 000, not R8 000

Inclusion can genuinely be removed.

3. Trade value instead of price

Keep price; provide approved R6 000 upgrade

Customer value R6 000 · venue profit cost R1 800

Protects R4 200 versus a cash concession

Approved selling value and incremental cost are current.

4. Accept deliberately

Accept R12 000 concession

Profit R18 000 · margin 16.7% · monthly forecast R193 000

R12 000 lower profit

Requires the authority route shown below.

Confidence & evidence

Confidence: high

Source: PincushionDemoEstateScenario · vinteractive-1

Calculation: pp-decision-analysis-1.0.0

Policy: fixture-1

Management may still choose the concession for a strategic reason, but the financial cost is explicit.

Authority implication

Requires General Manager approval

Synthetic delegated-authority policy v1. Every persona sees this same authoritative calculation.

discount percent: 3.8 · maximum 7.0

minimum margin percent: 22.0 · minimum 20.0

Evidence chain

1

Canonical fictional input

2

Deterministic PP economics

3

Formula IDs: DA-DISCOUNT-001, COM-OUT-001

4

Authoritative Decision Analysis

5

Policy version: fixture-1

Trustworthy quote ingestion

Clean source versus ambiguous source

The donor's fictional XLSX cases prove that PP can show what it read and refuse commitment when material evidence is unclear. Reviewing these fixtures writes only to the authorised sandbox and is cleared by reset.

Sandbox only