Skip to main content
Public overview

Pincushion Demo Estate

Fictional data · ZAR

Decision-driving inputs

Negotiation headroom

Deterministic recalculation
R
R
%
R

Inputs are synthetic and recalculate locally through PP's deterministic services. They never enter Actuals, Budget or a real venue record.

Management question

Locked evidence · 2026-09-16

The customer wants a concession. How far can we negotiate without giving away the return we need?

The booking is healthy. Management can concede up to R27 500 before the 22.0% target margin is crossed.

What PP sees

Current pricing already clears the approved return; this is negotiation headroom, not a corrective alert.

What is driving it

  1. 1. Current booking profitR62 150
  2. 2. Target margin22.0%

Consequence

A proposed R20 000 concession leaves R42 150 profit and 25.5% margin.

Reference point

Maximum target-preserving concession

R27 500 / 14.9%

Negotiation headroom

Target boundaryCurrent quoteProposed

Management options

1. Keep current price

No concession

R62 150 profit · 33.6% margin

No change

2. Test the requested concession

Concede R20 000

Revenue R165 000 · profit R42 150 · 25.5% margin

Profit lower by R20 000

Delivery cost remains unchanged.

3. Use the target-preserving boundary

Concede R27 500

Revenue R157 500 · profit R34 650 · 22.0% margin

Profit lower by R27 500

Delivery cost remains unchanged.

Confidence & evidence

Confidence: high

Source: PincushionDemoEstateScenario · vinteractive-1

Calculation: pp-decision-analysis-1.0.0

Policy: fixture-1

Authority implication

Within Sales / Events authority

Synthetic delegated-authority policy v1. Every persona sees this same authoritative calculation.

discount percent: 0.0 · maximum 3.0

minimum margin percent: 33.6 · minimum 24.0

Evidence chain

1

Canonical fictional input

2

Deterministic PP economics

3

Formula IDs: DA-PRICE-001

4

Authoritative Decision Analysis

5

Policy version: fixture-1

Trustworthy quote ingestion

Clean source versus ambiguous source

The donor's fictional XLSX cases prove that PP can show what it read and refuse commitment when material evidence is unclear. Reviewing these fixtures writes only to the authorised sandbox and is cleared by reset.

Sandbox only